Jacob B. Mack and Christopher A. Schuh explored that question in nanocrystalline Ni-2.5Pd by comparing APT measurements with atomistic simulations. They tracked segregation from small interfacial patches to entire boundaries and tested the methods used to extract those measurements.
The results point to an important distinction. In this system, palladium concentration varied far more within the same random boundary than it did from one measured boundary to another. The area included in the analysis therefore mattered as much as the boundaries selected.
“Why APT? The problem was inherently spatial. APT provided three-dimensional atomic positions and chemical identities across large analysis volumes. This allowed the researchers to locate boundaries, measure local interfacial excess, map palladium across thousands of square nanometers, and see how the sampled area changed the result.”
Following Palladium Across the Boundary
The experimental material was nanocrystalline Ni-2.5Pd powder equilibrated at 600 °C, with an average grain size of 110 nm. Researchers analyzed APT specimens using a CAMECA LEAP 5000 XS at the Northwestern University Center for Atom Probe Tomography (NUCAPT). Typical runs collected more than 10 million ions, and a total of eight grain boundaries were captured.
The boundaries became visible through an increased apparent density of palladium atoms, reflecting both chemical segregation and local magnification effects. The researchers traced each oriented boundary through successive slices, constructed a three-dimensional mesh, and assigned atoms to equal-area trajectories normal to the interface.
Ladder diagrams then provided the Gibbsian interfacial excess for each part of the mesh, showing how palladium segregation changed across the boundary.
The analysis workflow is shown in Figure 1: Overview of extracting local grain boundary concentrations from Atom Probe Tomography (a-d) and Atomistic Simulation (e-h) datasets. In order; (a,e) raw data, highlighting positions of solute atoms, from Atom Probe and Atomistics, (b,f) Ellipsoidal binning to label the grain boundary, (c,g) 3D mesh created from labeled points, (d,h) atom assignments for each mesh element, leading to the creation of ladder diagrams.Overview of extracting local grain boundary concentrations from Atom Probe Tomography (a-d) and Atomistic Simulation (e-h) datasets. In order; (a,e) raw data, highlighting positions of solute atoms, from Atom Probe and Atomistics, (b,f) Ellipsoidal binning to label the grain boundary, (c,g) 3D mesh created from labeled points, (d,h) atom assignments for each mesh element, leading to the creation of ladder diagrams.